Change of the voting grading system for animes [DONE/DENIED]

old granted and denied feature requests

Moderator: AniDB

jonatan
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 1:47 pm

Change of the voting grading system for animes [DONE/DENIED]

Post by jonatan » Mon Mar 14, 2005 1:52 pm

Rating 1 through 4 could be removed, people only use this for
war-voting on animes that are on the top 10 list from what I can tell..

Very few (if any) animes in AniDB deserves such a low grade on a 1-10 scale.
5 could be the lowest. Also then it's not possible for one person to change the statistics for the toplist so it'll be smoother :)

So, just remove all votes below 5 and keep the rest :) Otherwise the rating system can stay intact..

User avatar
Rar
AniDB Staff
Posts: 1471
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 2:41 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Rar » Mon Mar 14, 2005 2:12 pm

Eeheheheh. I think the kids should be encoraged to use the whole scale, rather than just shortening it... or maybe we could combine this with another feature request, and have 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8. 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10, and 11!!!!!111

Because anime is great. All of it. Including Platonic Chain, Panzer Dragoon, Angelique, and that god awful new shadow skill cg thing.

Oh, for the record I stand at 237 votes, avg. vote 5.38... so actually a bit more bad than good atm. :D

Rar

User avatar
Elias
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 4:55 pm

Post by Elias » Mon Mar 14, 2005 3:25 pm

If descriptions for votes will stay as are they now (with some new desc for half-points), than if 5 is 'neighter but nor good', must be also some vote for really bad titles (at least for warn others to better stay away from such titles). But there is no need to precisely specify how bad is title (maybe only two bad votes: little and very bad), so i would rather start votes from 4 (bad), then would be 4.5 (rather bad), 5 (neighter but nor good) ...

PetriW
AniDB Staff
Posts: 1522
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 2:34 pm

Post by PetriW » Mon Mar 14, 2005 3:43 pm

I have 12 below 5 entries and couple of 5 animes that would deserve a lower spot...
Plus after seing stuff like Platonic Chain I'm certain there's more stuff out there that deserves a LOW vote.

Andemon
Posts: 117
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:12 pm

Post by Andemon » Mon Mar 14, 2005 6:06 pm

We need more ratings, not less. Well, at least I do.
I've rated plenty of anime with 7, but when I compare any two of them, I can definitely say which one was better. None of them are good enough to rate 8, but there are some that'd reserve 7.5, while some others should only have 6.5. Image Half-scores would improve the rating accuracy -- for me, at least. :P

...and to you, o unbeliever who says that no anime deserves less than four, I say go watch Sailor and the 7 Ballz. Image

That anime aside, if I watch something that makes me so ill that I damn near Image, I should bloody well be able to give it an abysmal score. Image

(Err... DonGato, I hope you don't mind me (ab)using your smilies... Image)

Raptor
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:07 pm

Post by Raptor » Mon Mar 14, 2005 6:28 pm

what i dont like at them moment is that the average anime score is expected to be 7 according the rating description wich i would prefer to be at 5 as when the show was kind of good but nothing really great you are expected to give it a recommended - 7 but when the show was a bit better than that you are really short on numbers to write. Also the ratings go down a bit too fast for when you have animes that are not really good but not complete crap.

What happens is that most of my ratings go from 5 to 8 because most show range from not that good to not that great.


but i do agree that somes anime really deserve extremely low ratings to show just how bad they were.

Ultima
AniDB Staff
Posts: 335
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 11:13 pm
Location: GOTT Head Office, Planet Aineias

Post by Ultima » Mon Mar 14, 2005 9:08 pm

I agree with rar to add .5 to the rating system. :)

Rafal
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 2:46 am

Post by Rafal » Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:50 pm

I don't think that we shouldn't be allowed to rate lower than a 5, I've seen plenty of series that deserve a lower score. To me, like the current vote description says as well, an anime with a 5 is an anime that I didn't like, but isn't really bad either. I give animes that I think are plain bad a 4 (eg. Bakuretsu Tenshi, Onegai Twins), and a 3 or even a 2 to the really horrible ones (Grappler Baki 2, Kono Minikuku mo Utsukushii Sekai, Platonic Chain). I really think those series actually deserve that vote and wouldn't want to see them grouped together with the ones I voted a 5.

As for the .5 point rating scale , I don't know, a 10 point scale is enough for me personally, but I don't really mind if it is changed.

PetriW
AniDB Staff
Posts: 1522
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 2:34 pm

Post by PetriW » Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:21 am

Hundred point scale!!!! :oops:

Andemon
Posts: 117
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:12 pm

Post by Andemon » Tue Mar 15, 2005 1:51 pm

Hm.
100-point scale? I know that many sites use such rating scale (GameSpot, for example), and I personally would have no problems with it -- but I do know that some folks have great difficulty pinpointing their ratings on such a large scale, and would instead prefer something simpler. -_-;

Anyway, back to the topic of low low scores -- I do find them rather useful, especially when combined with Anime Hint best sync user list.

For example, there was one user whose ratings were quite similar to mine. When I looked at his ratings, I found out that he had rated a lot, but had only one rating lower than four -- and the rating for that one anime was 1. Considering that the rest of his rating scale was normal, that anime must've been something pretty horrible to qualify for such an abnormal rating.

Based on that data, I decided that it's probably wise to blacklist that anime. ;)

CheesyP18
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 1:44 am

Post by CheesyP18 » Thu Mar 17, 2005 2:34 am

I believe we should keep the low scores, just to reserve a spot for the next moe series :P

kidan
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 9:13 pm
Location: .DE

Post by kidan » Thu Mar 17, 2005 11:13 pm

http://www.anidb.net/tracker/view.php?id=117

^^ I expressed my opinion there ;)

User avatar
DonGato
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 9:08 pm
Location: The Pampas, The land of the Gaucho!
Contact:

Post by DonGato » Sun Mar 20, 2005 10:06 pm

1-10 should be kept.
.5 is not that needed IMO if people vote well (reading the descriptions of AniDB for each rate).

Rain
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: hello

Post by Rain » Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:18 am

DonGato wrote:1-10 should be kept.
.5 is not that needed IMO if people vote well (reading the descriptions of AniDB for each rate).
I agree... I think it's just fine as it is.

Jcubed
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:28 pm

Post by Jcubed » Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:32 pm

I, and most all the people I talked to in #AniDB agree with adding in .5's. There are many 6-8 rated shows that I'd like some seperation on. Espeically in the 7'ish area. It seems like a whole lot of people want it. If someone doesn't want it they can just keep voting whole numbers.

If you're willing to put some work into it there could be a profile option for whole numbers, .5, and even for .1. I know I'd put the .1's to use in the 7'ish area and DeathWolf said he would too.

If I like an anime it's getting a 7+ (rare cases an anime I can like can get a 6). 4 ratings for all the anime I like simply isn't enough, and I don't like giving out 10's so it's really only 3 ratings for all anime I like.

Locked