This post is a reply to the suggestions made in "Review Moderation & Trusted Users/Reviewers". As Lion's suggestions seem to be a accepted as a compromise, I decided to give it a fresh start.
As a short explanation for new readers:
You'll find the abbreviation "TR" being used in the following posts. It refers to "Trusted Reviewers", a group/classification that doesn't exists yet, but was suggested to be formed from the current (and future) reviewers in AniDB in one way or the other, as some kind of "expert-group".
Well, what I can say, I read all the posts and surely I missed something


I like the idea of changing the review system, I really hate animenfo's reviews, and when I see something like it on anidb it piss me off a bit.

And again I hate to see that a review has fallen down only because it is against an anime, perhaps a famous one that fanboys really like (this hasn't happened to me, or I think so

On the other side, with the going on of the discussion I felt that these TR where becoming more and more like censorship, and if it is true that this could prevent bad reviews to show on top of pages, or even to show, it doesn't suit my taste of doing things.
I thought a bit about all the discussion, and I came up with this idea:
the review system remains pretty much the same, but with a slight difference; there are the TR (elected, sorted by review rating or number or both, your choose) that CAN'T vote for the review. They receive a notice for voting about a review, let's say ten of the TR, and only after these ten people (choosen randomly) have expressed their vote, automatically to the review is added (or subtracted) x points (where x is to be studied how much big it should be). This way, even if a review is still visible, it would be high (or down) the reviews' list, being influenced by the stronger vote of a full group of TRs (people that we suppose are able to judge a review).
I think it should be good that reviews that are lower than a certain score should be shown in another page, let's say we have a link on the bottom of the reviews' list that says "show other reviews".
Plus, I think that a review that gets a really bad score should be deleted after a while. Given the fact that the passage between a "second page review" and a "to be deleted" review shouldn't be so fast (or if it is, then surely that review it's just trash), the reviewer has all the time he need to edit his review and repost it. Of course TR vote shouldn't be so big that could put a review from first page directly in the "to be deleted" list, so only TR vote together with the votes of some "normal" users could sign the death of a review.
I think this way TR judgement is important (but not imperative, 'cause a big mass of people could still influence the review in a way or another) and bad reviews would be put away after a bit of time, not disturbing the reading of the good ones.
As I said, just my two cents.