"Quality-ratings for dummies" [DONE/DENIED]

old granted and denied feature requests

Moderator: AniDB

Locked
wahaha
AniDB Staff
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 3:33 pm

"Quality-ratings for dummies" [DONE/DENIED]

Post by wahaha »

Why?
Although it contradicts the length of this post, I'd actually be happy with "just" most current fansubs being on:
  • very high: nearly none, "reserved" for dvd-source-rereleases
  • high: most
  • medium: some
  • low: few, mainly new groups with trouble or files which are subject to a v2.
So, it might be helpful to compile some info on "how one could rate a certain file", to help giving a better understanding of the ratings. I'm thinking something to be put under a Image-popup-text.

A suggestion:
  • unknown - You haven't watched the file yet or can't tell by your impression of previous files. Make sure to add the quality-rating once you've watched it!
    very high - No issues at all. Video, sound and subtitles are exactly the way they should be.
    high - There are minor issues with this, like very few visible encoding artifacts - maybe just in one particular scene or slight translation/editing-errors.
    medium - One can clearly spot encoding issues in video or sound, or the translation is off or even missing (e.g. signs) sometimes.
    low - There's a permanent annoyance in video, audio or translation.
    very low - This is not quite what one would want to watch. The video, sound or translation are just disturbingly bad.
    corrupted - Used for files with clearly visible corruptions.
    eyecancer - Avoid this file. It can't get worse than this.
The problem is of course to agree on what "annoying" is, how to judge the usual artifacts of the lossy compression*) and other matters of personal preference, for example the "missing signs" which I'd personally put to "medium".

[ *)Could be solved by offering sample-pictures for each quality. ]

Other issues related to quality, like missing song-translations (inbetween or OP/ED) or bad typesetting could be summarized with a passage like: "When there's another major issue (like A or B) while the file would otherwise qualify for a higher quality, downrate it by one step."

Opinions? :)
rowaasr13
Posts: 415
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 4:57 am

Post by rowaasr13 »

Missing signs should be "very high", and signs overwritten with english should be "corrupted". :evil:

(/me hates overlays. If there's error in translation, you'll never know until you find original).
Locked