is a fair and unbiased critique of my review?constraint wrote: 31.01.06 02:11 Kimi ga Nozomu Eien constraint (92094) 1 I will rate your review the same way you came up with a four for the animation.
Perhaps it could be... deleted?
Moderator: AniDB
is a fair and unbiased critique of my review?constraint wrote: 31.01.06 02:11 Kimi ga Nozomu Eien constraint (92094) 1 I will rate your review the same way you came up with a four for the animation.
Actually you can, we can delete review comments.Charn wrote:and I can't bring this matter up with a mod to have it resolved
It's highly possible that at that time, we *couldn't* delete review comments.Charn wrote:I have PMed one moderator (which I won't say his name) and asked him what should I do, and the reply I got did not answer any of the questions I raised.
I agree with this philosophy. I wish some other boards could be like this, because it is sometimes very annoying to see hundreds of messages being deleted by mods just because of a difference of point of view.Rar wrote:I'll point out that we don't really want to moderate review comments too much, they should generally be considered private communications, and I encourage people to revoke them and rethink rather than just deleting them, except in complete spam-abuse cases. It's not the mod's job to mediate over what is and what isn't a good review and what is and what isn't fair critisism.
The reason why I gave KgnE a 4 is because of the lazy, uninspired animation. The gratuitous use of panning, still frame reaction, and gererally boring animation. The animation does not differ from the "standard" anime style in any comprehensible way. To put this into perspective, the animation for the most part was of the quality of Noir. The only real difference between the two was that Noir had very well-animated action scenes. Plus Noir was a much superior anime, the anime having lesbians in it.DonGato wrote:He might be wrong in answering like that... but a 4 for animation? What you leave for really bad animations. -_-;