AniDB

Hmm, pretty interesting. Two points I noticed from the earlier posts... While the reviews have certain requirements to them, the review responses have none. A review, and the responses it ignites, can't be too personal a matter, since they were posted to the Internet with the purpose of changing oth...

I have to admit I find the idea of making the review feedbacks public very promising. It wouldn't even need be anything but a next-to-invisible link somewhere on the sidelines to open them up, if so willed. I think it would give added credibility to any review feedbacks if they have to be 'good enou...

I fear you have misunderstood the purpose of the previous posting. While a Wiki-type editorial environment opens up possibilities for unmeasurable advancement in content amount, it doesn't come off free. After running to the first setback this route gives space to, I've become curious if there's a g...

After writing a review I had a response telling me in so many words to get rid of it and how stupid I am for writing it. Then we exchanged a few PMs about the subject at hand, which then resulted in the person going through my past reviews and scoring them systematically low, seemingly on purpose as...

The feedback suggestion has already been solved. Indeed. What i think it's now missing would be concrete guidance for passing-by users into giving short feedback for why they think this review is good or bad. Instead of simply voting Yes/No, I would prefer a voting system that has four possible vot...

Hiya. Alot of interesting discussion in the topic... There are a few points to tackle still luckily. IMO: Reviews need feedback. That's the best way to improve one's work. The review approval system currently in use is very nice. Its drawback is that it's very general, and thus overlooks details com...

File information received from Chii with !file could have the CRC checksum included, if it was entered in the database.